The article discusses the debatable issues of constructing a crucial element of crime investigation methodology, referred to in Article 1581 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – its forensic characteristics with regard to theft as a method of embezzlement. It is emphasized that the basis of this characteristic lies in the presence of a specific subject in a crime with administrative preclusion, who links several similar unlawful acts into one crime. The necessity of taking into account the specific interrelationships manifested both during the commission of an administratively punishable (preceding) petty theft and during the subsequent petty theft leading to the initiation of criminal proceedings under Article 1581 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code) is indicated. An analysis is conducted on the composition and structure of the forensic characteristics of petty theft committed by a person subjected to administrative punishment, considering such a systemic element of forensic characteristics as the specific personality of the offender, whose properties are revealed through a series of interrelated similar offenses and find their reflection in his choice of preparation methods, perpetration methods, concealment methods, consideration of the circumstances surrounding the commission of these acts, and other elements of said characteristics.
crimes with administrative pretrial background; forensic characteristics of a crime; petty theft; theft; volumetric and prejudicial connection; investigation modeling.
1. Knyaz'kov A.S., Kruglikov V.D. Preyudiciya kak faktor formirovaniya novogo vida chastnyh kriminalisticheskih metodik // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2023. № 492. S. 181-192.
2. Myamgyakov Z.Z. Administrativnaya preyudiciya v ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2022. 29 s.
3. Ayupova G.Sh. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narushenie pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2018. 27 s.
4. Obuhova T.V. K voprosu o nekotoryh osobennostyah konstruirovaniya norm s administrativnoy preyudiciey // Vestnik Ural'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2018. № 2. S. 83-85.
5. Golovin A.Yu. Teoreticheskie osnovy i aktual'nye problemy kriminalisticheskoy sistematiki na sovremennom etape razvitiya kriminalistiki: dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. Tula, 2002. 460 s.
6. Golovin A.Yu., Konovalov S.I. Sistemnyy podhod v teorii i metodologii sovremennoy kriminalistiki. Tula: Izd-vo Tul'skogo gos. un-ta, 2001. 72 s.
7. Knyaz'kov A.S. Sistemnost' kak atribut taktiko-kriminalisticheskoy operacii / A.S. Knyaz'kov // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2013. № 4 (9). S. 253-262.
8. Vardanyan A.V. Razvitie sistem znaniy o kriminalisticheskoy harakteristike postkriminal'noy deyatel'nosti kak zakonomernyy rezul'tat postupatel'nogo razvitiya nauki kriminalistiki / A.V. Vardanyan // Kriminalistika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2021. № 1 (17). S. 44-51.
9. Stepanenko D.A., Stepanenko R.A. Principy postroeniya obschey metodiki rassledovaniya vzyatochnichestva i inyh korrupcionnyh prestupleniy // kriminalistika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2020. № 3 (15). S. 149-156.
10. Bezverhov A.G. Administrativnaya preyudicial'nost' v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoki, realii, perspektivy // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Pravo». 2011. № 2 (10). S. 39-52.
11. Volzhenkin B.V. Obschestvennaya opasnost' prestupnika i osnovanie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1963. № 3. S. 92-99.
12. Matyuhina T.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za melkoe hischenie, sovershennoe licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2023. 25 s.
13. Zhilova M.V. K voprosu o specificheskih chertah narusheniy pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2020. № 3. Tom XIII. S. 305-307.
14. Konovalov S.I. Voprosy razvitiya obschey teorii kriminalistiki // Kriminalistika: aktual'nye voprosy teorii i praktiki: sb. tr. uchastnikov Mezhd. nauch.-prakt. konf. Rostov-na-Donu, 2017. S. 73-78.
15. Konovalov S.I., Ayvazova O.V. Mezhdisciplinarnyy harakter kategorii «sposob prestupleniya»: problema sootnosheniya ugolovno-pravovyh, ugolovno-processual'nyh i kriminalisticheskih aspektov // Yurist'-Pravoved'. 2007. № 4. S. 17-22.
16. Ergasheva Z.E. Administrativnaya preyudiciya v ugolovnom prave: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2018. 215 s.
17. Zhaytumenova A.R. Osnovnye parametry modeli mehanizma melkogo hischeniya, sovershennogo licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu (st. 1581 UK RF) // Vestnik VEGU. 2019. № 1 (99). S. 136-141.
18. Malyhina N.I. Kriminalisticheskoe uchenie o lice, sovershivshem prestuplenie: dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2017. 403 s.
