UDK 343.985.1 План следствия. План расследования
Introduction: the article analyzes the factors affecting the interrogation of suspects and accused in cases of misuse of budget funds and state extra-budgetary funds, predetermined as the mechanism of these acts, so criminalistically significant features of typical subjects of crimes. Special attention is paid to various aspects of preparation for interrogation, which is an important condition for improving the effectiveness of these investigative actions. Materials and methods: the normative basis of the study is the Constitution of the Russian Federation, first of all, the norms fixing guarantees of protection of the rights and legitimate interests of suspects and accused, criminal and criminal procedure legislation, budget legislation, as well as local normative legal acts regulating various issues of financing within the framework of budget legal relations the Empirical base was the materials of 130 criminal cases on crimes provided for in articles 185.1, 185.2 of the criminal code of the Russian Federation. The methodological basis of the study was the General dialectical method of cognition, which allowed to consider the specifics of the interrogation of suspects and accused persons in different aspects and in connection with a single process of investigation in the criminal case of these crimes. In addition, the study used methods of observation, description, generalization, comparison, modeling, analysis and synthesis. Results: recommendations have been developed to improve the efficiency of interrogations of suspects, accused in cases of misuse of budget funds and state extra-budgetary funds. Conclusions and conclusion: the position of the suspect, the accused, essentially expressed in respect of his suspicion or charges of misappropriation of budget funds and funds of state extra-budgetary funds, largely depends on the state of the evidence base in the criminal case, the optimal choice of the investigator means of tactical influence, as well as the competence of the investigator in matters of the budget sphere. This leads to the need for more thorough and comprehensive preparatory activities, the nature and content of which are presented in this work.
byudzhet, sredstva byudzheta, necelevoe rashodovanie, ispol'zovanie, dolzhnostnoe lico, sledstvennaya situaciya, storony, obvinyaemyy, podozrevaemyy, dopros, pokazaniya, sledstvennye deystviya
1. Govorov A.A. Konfliktnye sudebno-sledstvennye situacii, formiruyuschiesya po delam o necelevom rashodovanii byudzhetnyh sredstv skvoz' prizmu processual'nyh garantiy obespecheniya prava na zaschitu // Yurist'-Pravoved'. - 2018. - № 2 (85). - S. 83-87.
2. Gribunov O.P. Gosudarstvennye programmy social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya kak ob'ekt kriminalisticheskogo nauchnogo poznaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-processual'noe pravo - uroki istorii i problemy dal'neyshego reformirovaniya: sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. - Orel, 2018. - S. 109-114.
3. Konovalov S.I., Ayvazova O.V. Razdelenie ravnoznachnyh processual'nyh funkciy obvineniya, zaschity i razresheniya dela v sisteme principov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: sovremennye problemy // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - 2014. - № 3-2. - S. 11-16.
4. Gribunov O.P., Stepanova V.G. Obosnovannost' podozreniya kak garantiya zakonnosti ogranicheniya prav i svobod grazhdan pri primenenii mer prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 13-18.
5. Ayvazova O.V., Konovalov S.I. Kriminalisticheskiy priem kak kategoriya sovremennoy nauki kriminalistiki // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - 2016. - № 2-2. - S. 73-79.
6. Gribunov O.P. Kriminalisticheskie aspekty dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2017. - № 420. - S. 150-153.
7. Govorov A. A. The Conflict of law and judicial investigation of the situation, the emerging cases of non-targeted expenditure of budget funds through the prism of procedural guarantees to ensure the protection of the right // The lawyer. - 2018. - № 2 (85). - P. 83-87.
8. Gribunov O.P. State programs of socio-economic development as an object of forensic scientific knowledge // Modern criminal procedural law - lessons of history and problems of further reform: Collection of materials of the International scientific-practical conference. To the 300th anniversary of the Russian police. - Orel, 2018. - P. 109-114.
9. Konovalov S. I., Aivazova O. V. Division equivalent procedural functions of prosecution, defense and resolution of the case in the system of principles of criminal proceedings: modern problems // Izvestia of the Tula state University. Economic and legal Sciences. - 2014. - No. 3-2. - P. 11-16.
10. Gribunov O. P., Stepanova V. G. Validity of suspicion as a guarantee of the legality of the restriction of the rights and freedoms of citizens in the application of coercive measures in criminal proceedings// Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. - 2018. - No. 5. - P. 13-18.
11. Aivazova, O. V., Konovalov S. I. Criminalistic technique as a modern category of forensic science // Izvestiya of Tula state University. Economic and legal Sciences. - 2016. - No. 2-2. - P. 73-79.
12. Gribunov O. P. Forensic aspects of pre-trial agreement on cooperation // Vestnik of Tomsk state University. - 2017. - No. 420. - P. 150-153.
