employee from 01.01.2016 to 01.01.2025
Nadym, Salekhard, Russian Federation
Introduction. The article analyzes problematic legal situations that arise as a result of significant changes in the competence of public authorities during the redistribution of powers between public authorities and local governments, using the example of the possibilities of the latter's participation in the protection of public order. Such changes do not always comprehensively cover all multilaterally interrelated provisions of laws, and sometimes they are introduced asynchronously. Thus, the fundamental norm establishing general principles may become invalid, but the concretizing and detailing norm stipulated by it in another law will continue to be implemented. Such incidents manifest themselves in the context of the spread of framework legal regulation at the horizontal level of the structure of Russian legislation. As a result of such legislative defects, a legal phenomenon arises, which is proposed to be considered as indirect ultraactivity, since the provision of the law that has become invalid continues to be implemented to some extent through the current provision that develops it. Materials and methods. The normative basis of the study was the legislation of the Russian Federation and the USSR, which continues to operate in the Russian Federation, subordinate regulatory legal acts concerning the competence of local governments in the field of public order protection and materials on the practice of exercising certain state powers that have not been transferred in accordance with the established procedure. The methodological basis of the study is a comparative-legal retrospective analysis, which makes it possible to understand the meaning of the provisions of the law in the framework of legal regulation and determine the potential for its implementation.. The results of the study. An analysis of the content of the provisions of the laws in force during the period of drafting, adoption and entry into force of a number of difficult-to-implement existing provisions of the laws allows us to conclude that the latter have adopted and are developing the repealed or significantly amended provisions. As a result, an imbalance is formed between the fundamental and concretizing norms, due to the weakening of the logical and substantive links between them. It is possible to replace the general rules, but to keep the specific ones unchanged. The difficulties that inevitably arise in the process of implementing such provisions are due to their insufficient correlation with the powers of the relevant public authorities. Problems in the implementation of the competence of local governments in the field of public order protection can often be conditionally resolved only in a "formal and legal" way, through the issuance of municipal legal acts that are potentially unable to have a significant impact on the emerging legal relations. Conclusions and conclusions. The reform of the system of public authorities, associated with the redistribution of powers between them, is a complex dynamic process, often asynchronously covering the entire complex of multilaterally interrelated normative legal acts. It is possible to transform the essence of the implementation of individual powers from direct implementation to participation in such. At the same time, the nature of some powers in the field of crime prevention is changing, from the own powers of local governments to individual state powers, which may be delegated, but not transferred in accordance with the established procedure.
Local governments, issues of local importance, public order, ultraactivity
1. Shugrina E. S. Polnomochiya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v sfere okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i obespecheniya bezopasnosti (k 70-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora V. I. Fadeeva) [Powers of local self-government bodies in the field of public order protection and security (dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Professor V. I. Fadeev)]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina - Bulletin of the University named after O. E. Kutafin (MGYUA). 2019, no. 9, pp. 186-195. (In Russ.).
2. Sinyukov V. N. Teoriya prava S. S. Alekseeva i ee rol' v razvitii otechestvennoj yuridicheskoj doktriny [S. S. Alekseev's theory of law and its role in the development of Russian legal doctrine]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava- Journal of Russian Law. 2020, no. 2, pp. 5-20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2020.013.
3. Sil'chenko N. V. Sistema formal'nykh istochnikov sovremennogo prava i problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya pravotvorcheskoj deyatel'nosti [The system of formal sources of modern law and the problems of legal regulation of law-making activities]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava- Journal of Russian Law. 2017, no. 10, pp. 13-24. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/article_59c4d75e496a59.57944357.
4. Perevalov V. D. Normy prava: problemy ponimaniya i opredeleniya [Norms of law:problems of understanding and definition]. Rossijskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka -Russian Law: Education, Practice, and Science. 2017, no. 5, pp. 10-19. (In Russ.).
5. Golubcov V. G., Kuznecova O. A. Tipy dejstviya norm prava vo vremeni [Types of legal norms in time]. Yuridicheskie nauki- Legal sciences. 2022, no. 3, pp. 348-371. (In Russ.).
6. Zyryanov S. M. Gosudarstvennyj kontrol' (nadzor). [State control (supervision)] Moscow : Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossijskoj Federacii. OOO ’Yuridicheskaya firma ‘KontrakT’. 2023, 232 p. (In Russ.).
7. Umanskaya V. P. Problemy razgranicheniya i realizacii polnomochij Rossijskoj Federacii i ee sub"ektov po sostavleniyu protokolov ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, posyagayushchih na obshchestvennyj poryadok [Problems of differentiation and implementation of the powers of the Russian Federation and its subjects to draw up protocols on administrative offenses infringing on public order]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018, no. 11, pp. 66-72. (In Russ.).
8. Kuchin M.V. Yuridicheskaya priroda pravovoj normy: integrativnyj podhod [The legal nature of a legal norm: an integrative approach]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2017, no. 12, pp. 31-42. (In Russ.).
9. Zhuravlev R. A. Pravovye aspekty organizacii municipal'noj milicii (k tret'emu zakonoproektu o sozdanii municipal'noj milicii [Legal aspects of the organization of the municipal militia (to the third draft law on the creation of the municipal militia]. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii- Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017, no. 4, pp. 180-185. (In Russ.).
10. Koryc S. I., Surgutskov V. I., Filippov O. Yu. Polnomochiya municipal'nyh organovpo ohrane obshchestvennogo poryadka: v poiskah zolotoj serediny [The powers of municipal bodies to protect public order: in search of a golden mean]. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava- Current issues of Russian law. 2018, no. 11, pp. 192-199. (In Russ.).
11. Il'in A. V. Razgranichenie normativnyh pravovyh i administrativnyh aktov dlya celej vybora nadlezhashchej processual'noj formy ih osparivaniya [Differentiation of normative legal and administrative acts for the purpose of choosing the appropriate procedural form of their challenge]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika- Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2025, no. 6, pp. 25-33. (In Russ.).
