ON THE QUESTION OF SOME PROBLEMS OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL APPARATUS OF FORENSIC TACTICS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Introduction. The article examines the issues of the emergence, formation and development of forensic tactics, as a branch of criminology, through the prism of terminological aspects. In particular, the objects of the study are some controversial and ambiguous issues regarding the use and use, both in theory and in practice, of some key terms – important components of the terminological apparatus of forensic tactics as a branch of forensic science. The positions of forensic scientists at different stages of time regarding the content of forensic tactics in the system of forensic knowledge are considered. Special attention is paid to the terminology of investigative tactics. Using the example of the production of some investigative actions, the author discusses the correctness of the use of the term "tactics" and its derivative terminological constructions. Materials and methods. The normative base of the study was the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, as well as scientific works of domestic and foreign authors on the issues of the designated issues. When writing the article, the fundamental provisions of materialistic dialectics were used, as well as general and particular methods of scientific cognition, including historical and comparative legal, logical and philosophical, generalizations, descriptions, and others. The theoretical and practical significance of this article is determined by the provisions and conclusions formulated in it regarding some methodological aspects of criminology as an independent science, including the author's critical view of the entrenched use of terms in criminalistic tactics, the expediency of using them in a particular context in the process of investigating crimes is questioned. To substantiate his position, the author explores the etymology and genesis of these terms, as well as provides opinions of other forensic scientists on the issues identified. Research results. Based on the analysis of the regulatory framework of the preliminary investigation system, the theoretical positions of various criminologists, taking into account the rules and laws developed in terminology, the author gives a reasoned opinion on the expediency, and, in some cases, the incorrectness of the use of certain terms in the conceptual apparatus of criminology. Conclusions. Based on the results of the conducted research, a number of conclusions and proposals have been made regarding the improvement of the terminological apparatus of forensic tactics as a section of criminology. In particular, the author's opinion is argued that the appropriateness of using the term "tactics" is directly dependent on the specific investigative situation caused by the predictive and search activity of the investigator, therefore, both in theory and in practice, it is important to understand and distinguish between "tactics", "organization and preparation", "technology" of investigative actions. The author believes that his conclusions and proposals require further discussion in the scientific community in order to develop a unified position among scientists on the controversial issues of the conceptual apparatus of criminology for its unification and implementation in the field of practical activity, which will facilitate the process of interaction of all subjects of the process of disclosure and investigation of crimes, and, accordingly, will contribute to countering crime in general.

Keywords:
terminology, forensic tactics, investigator, tactics of investigative actions, organization and preparation of investigative actions, technology of investigative actions
References

1. Svetlichny A.A. Formation, current state and some trends in the development of the terminological apparatus of criminalistics // Collection of articles based on the materials of the International scientific and practical conference "Topical issues of law enforcement" dedicated to the memory of the prosecutor of the Kazakh SSR Utegen Seitovich Seitov / Kosshy: Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2022. 399 p. 92-98.

2. Svetlichny A.A. Innovations in the terminological apparatus of criminology: the need for science and practice or a tribute to fashion? // Legal education and science. 2022. No. 5. pp. 24-29.

3. Svetlichny A.A. Patterns of formation and development of domestic legal terminology // In the collection: Improvement of legislative and law enforcement practice in the field of criminal law sciences in modern conditions: controversial issues. International scientific and Practical Conference. 2022. pp. 342-350.

4. Svetlichny A.A. Genesis and some modern trends in the formation of the terminological apparatus of criminology // Bulletin of the Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after I.D. Putilin. 2023. No. 2 (53). pp. 69-74.

5. Yakimov I.N. Criminalistics. A guide to criminal techniques and tactics. A new edition, reprinted from the 1925 edition / Yakimov I.N. - M.: Lexest, 2003. 496 p.

6. Svetlichny A.A. Modern integration processes of the terminological apparatus of criminal law sciences // Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. 2022. No. 1. pp. 102-113.

7. Svetlichny A. A. Integration of scientific knowledge as a factor of unification and optimization of the formation of a unified terminological system of disciplines of the criminal law block // Legal education and science. 2022. No. 3. pp. 36-41.

8. Svetlichny A.A. Integration of terminological models of related disciplines of the criminal law block into a single terminological system // Business. Education. Right. 2022. No. 2 (59). pp. 146-150.

9. Panarina D.V., Svetlichny A.A. Terms and definitions of forensic examination: genesis, methodology and problems: an educational and methodological manual / ed. Jurid. Sciences, associate professor T.V. Tolstukhina. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2023. 152 p.

10. Belitsky V.Yu. Conceptual and categorical apparatus of criminalistic science // Criminalistics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2020. No. 1. (13). pp. 9-15.

11. Panarina D.V. Modern problems and trends in the development of the language of the general theory of forensic examination: Dis. ...cand. Jurid. sciences'. – Tula, 2018. 238 p.

12. Starichkov M.V. Tactics of inspection and seizure of computer information carriers // Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012. No. 2(61). pp. 18-26.

13. Sotova T.N., Peryakova Yu.A. Tactics of conducting an investigative experiment // State and society: current issues of interaction. Materials of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the All-Russian State University of Justice. Kazan Institute (branch) VGUY (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia). 2020. pp. 328-334.

14. Gavrilova P.L., Miroshnikov I.A. Topical issues of the tactics of the examination // Modern problems of law-making and law enforcement at the student scientific and practical conference. Volume 1. Irkutsk Institute (branch) All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia). 2019. pp. 194-197.

15. Fasmer. M. Etymological dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes / Max Fasmer; translated from German. and additional by O. N. Trubacheva. - 4th ed., erased. - Moscow: Astrel: AST, 2007.

16. Shansky N.M. , Bobrova T.A. School etymological dictionary of the Russian language. The origin of the words. — M.: Bustard. 2004. 398 p.

17. Weingard L. Criminal tactics. Ovruch, 1910. 463 p.

18. Volchetskaya T.S., Golovin A.Yu., Osipova E.V. Features of the development of Russian and American criminology: forensic techniques, tactics and methodology // Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right. 2018. No. 29 Pp. 40-52.

19. Vasiliev A.N. Criminalistics. Investigative tactics (general provisions). – M., 1971. 462 p.

20. Belkin R.S., Lifshits E.M. Tactics of investigative actions. – M., 1997. 176 p.

21. Chistova L. E. On some elements of tactical and forensic support // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 2. pp. 116-120.

22. Karlov V.Ya. Criminalistic tactics: textbook. a handbook for bachelors. - Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2013. 182 p.

23. Bessonov A.A. Criminalistic tactics: textbook. - Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2015. 199 p.

24. Bakhin V.P. Criminalistics. Problems and opinions (1962-2002). – Kiev, 2002. 268 p.

25. Shepitko V.Yu. Theoretical problems of systematization of tactical techniques in criminology. – Kharkov, 1995. 200 p.

26. Baev O.Ya. Selected works: in 2t. Vol.1. – Voronezh, 2011. 429 p.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?