employee
Introduction: this scientific article addresses the pressing issue of delineating administrative and tax liability for tax offenses within the context of Russian law. The research aims to analyze the mechanisms for determining and distinguishing between administrative and tax sanctions, as well as identifying the principles and criteria that should be considered when deciding to hold someone accountable. The article examines the significant features of the division between administrative and tax measures of responsibility, and it analyzes cases where it becomes necessary to determine the applicable measures. The research focuses on Russian tax legislation as its subject matter and the commission of tax offenses and the sanctions that may be applied as its object. Special attention is given to a comparative analysis of the practice of applying administrative and tax sanctions in Russia. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the importance of clearly defining the competence and cooperation between tax and administrative authorities when dealing with cases of tax offenses. Effective collaboration between these entities contributes to more effectively combating tax crimes and ensuring compliance with the law. Materials and Methods: the normative basis of the research comprises the Constitution of the Russian Federation, domestic legislative acts regulating the procedure and conditions for imposing tax liability, as well as formulating the fundamental approaches to legal responsibility for violating tax legislation. The methodological foundation of the research is based on the general dialectical method of scientific cognition, which has a universal character, as well as methods of logical deduction, induction, cognitive methods, and techniques of observation, comparison, analysis, generalization, and description. Results: as a result of the research, a conclusion is drawn regarding the need to improve the procedures for delineating administrative and tax liability in Russia and the significance of applying transparent and fair criteria when considering such cases. This study provides a valuable contribution to the field of tax system improvement and the maintenance of law and order in Russia. Summary and Conclusion: tax liability is an independent form of legal responsibility.
tax law, administrative law, tax liability, administrative liability, tax offense, tax system, tax legislation, delineation of liability.
1. Evsikova, E.V. Public-Legal Responsibility in Modern Russian Law: Theoretical and Legal Aspect. Uchenye Zapiski Krymskogo Federalnogo Universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie Nauki [Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Legal Sciences]. 2022. Vol. 8, No. 4. Pp. 87-96.
2. Kravchenko, N.A. On the Public-Legal Nature of Tax Liability. Zhurnal Pravovykh i Ekonomicheskikh Issledovanii [Journal of Legal and Economic Research]. 2022. No. 2. Pp. 66-70.
3. Administrative Law in Russia: Textbook and Practicum for Universities. Edited by A.I. Stakhov and P.I. Kononov. 3rd Edition, Revised and Expanded. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing, 2020. 484 p.
4. Stakhov, A.I., Kononov, P.I. Administrative Law in Russia: Textbook for Bachelor's, Specialist's, and Master's Programs. 4th Edition, Revised and Expanded. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing, 2019. 685 p.
5. Walter, A.V. Criminogenic Determinants of Tax Crime: Issues and Solutions. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo Instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2022. No. 4 (103), pp. 108-122. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.55001/2312-3184.2022.90.33.011.
6. K.V. Public Responsibility for Environmental Offenses: Theoretical Aspects and Problems of Law Enforcement in the Digital Space. Evraziiskii Yuridicheskii Zhurnal [Eurasian Legal Journal]. 2022. No. 9 (172). Pp. 146-150.
7. Gogin, A.A. Theoretical and Legal Aspects of Tax Liability [Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences]. Saratov, 2002. 237 p.
8. Kirin A.V. Administrative-Tort Law (Theory and Legislative Framework). Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. 463 p.
9. Kinsburskaya V.A. Responsibility for Violation of Tax and Fee Legislation Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2013. 203 p.
10. Shcherbakova, K.V. Tax Liability as Part of Administrative Law: Problems of Legislative Regulation. Molodoi Uchenyi [Young Scientist]. 2017. No. 26 (160). Pp. 138 141.
11. Tyutina, Y.V. The Content of Financial-Legal Responsibility. Finansovoe Pravo [Financial Law]. 2009. No. 2. Pp. 19-21.
12. Zrelov A.P. Administrative Investigation of Violations of Tax and Fee Legislation. [Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences]. Moscow, 2005. 232 p.
13. Financial Law of the Russian Federation: Textbook for Higher Education Institutions Specializing in Jurisprudence. Edited by M.V. Karaseva. 2nd Edition, Revised and Expanded. Moscow: Yurist Publishing, 2006. 591 p.
14. Ternova, L.V. Tax Liability as an Independent Form of Legal Responsibility. Finansy (Finance). 1998. No. 9. Pp. 27-29.
15. Nugumanov, A.R., Subkhangulov, R.R. On Responsibility for Violation of Legislation in the Field of Taxes and Levies and Its Place in the System of Legal Responsibility. Obshchestvo, Pravo, Gosudarstvennost: Retrospektiva i Perspektiva [Society, Law, Statehood: Retrospective and Perspective]. 2020. No. 2 (2). Pp. 34-38.
16. Shvedova, O.V. On the Differentiation of Tax and Administrative Responsibility for Violations in the Taxation Sphere. Voprosy Rossiiskoi Yustitsii [Issues of Russian Justice]. 2019. No. 11. Pp. 605-611.
17. Zimulkin M.I. The Concept of the Significance of Violation of Procedural and Procedural Norms in the Application of Tax Legislation in the Field of Tax Monitoring. Evraziiskii Yuridicheskii Zhurnal [Eurasian Legal Journal]. 2021. No. 1 (152). Pp. 247-249.
18. Pepelyaev, S.G., Alekhin, A.P. Responsibility for Violation of Tax Legislation. Moscow, 1992. 96 pages.
19. Farkhutdinov, R.D. Fault in Tax Legal Relations. Yuridicheskii Vestnik Samarskogo Universiteta [Legal Bulletin of Samara University]. 2022. Vol. 8, No. 4. Pp. 34 36.
20. Evsikova, E.V. Problems of Theory and Practice of Administrative Liability. Evraziiskii Yuridicheskii Zhurnal [Eurasian Legal Journal]. 2018. No. 10 (125). Pp. 108-110.
