Submit manuscript
Home / Journals / Vestnik of the East Siberian institute of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Russian Federation / Issue 4 / CHANGING THE CHARGE IN COURT: FURTHER ADJUSTMENT OF THE MECHANISM OF RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE PROSECUTION AND THE COURT IS REQUIRED
CHANGING THE CHARGE IN COURT: FURTHER ADJUSTMENT OF THE MECHANISM OF RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE PROSECUTION AND THE COURT IS REQUIRED
Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text
To cite
Citations:

CHANGING THE CHARGE IN COURT: FURTHER ADJUSTMENT OF THE MECHANISM OF RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE PROSECUTION AND THE COURT IS REQUIRED
VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки
MURAVEV K V 1
BULATOV B B 2
Authors:
1.  Omsk Academy of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia

2.  Law Kirov district court of Omsk

Type:
Article
Pages:
from 102 to 111
Status:
Published
Received:
15.12.2018
Accepted:
15.12.2018
Published:
25.12.2018
Subject area:
VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
charge, court, Prosecutor, change of charge, return of criminal case to the Prosecutor, limits of trial
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes the legal position of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the issue of changing charges after the direction of the criminal case in the trial. The authors positively assess the restoration of the possibility of adjusting the charge to a more serious one in court in cases where this is not due to the incompleteness of the preliminary investigation and inquiry. At the same time, the process of improving the legislative regulation is incomplete. It is proved that the position of the Prosecutor to change the charges in the direction of mitigation (part 8 of article 246 of the code of criminal procedure) may not be mandatory for the court, does not entail the obligation to stop criminal prosecution.

Keywords:
charge, court, Prosecutor, change of charge, return of criminal case to the Prosecutor, limits of trial
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. O sudebnom prigovore: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda RF ot 29 apr. 1996 g. № 1 (red. ot 16 apr. 2013 g.) // Byul. Verhovnogo suda RF. 1996. № 7 (p. 9).

2. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy punktov 1 i 3 ch. 1 st. 232, ch. 4 st. 248 i ch. 1 st. 258 UPK RSFSR v svyazi s zaprosami Irkutskogo rayonnogo suda Irkutskoy oblasti i Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda goroda Nizhniy Novgorod: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 20 apr. 1999 g. 7-P // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

3. Koncepciya sudebnoy reformy v Rossiyskoy Federacii / sost. S.A. Pashin. M., 1992. 110 s.

4. Markina E.A., Baeva T.N. Vozvraschenie sudom ugolovnogo dela prokuroru: vozmozhno li rasshirit' ob'em obvineniya, izmenit' ego na bolee tyazhkoe? // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2006. № 1. S. 35-38.

5. Ryabinina T.K. Vozvraschenie ugolovnogo dela prokuroru: starye problemy v novom svete // Ros. sledovatel'. 2013. № 24. S. 6-10.

6. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy statey 125, 219, 227, 229, 236, 237, 239, 246, 254, 271, 378, 405 i 408, a takzhe glav 35 i 39 UPK RF v svyazi s zaprosami sudov obschey yurisdikcii i zhalobami grazhdan: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 8 dek. 2003 g. № 18-P // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

7. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy statey 237, 413, 418 UPK RF v svyazi s zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 16 maya 2007 g. № 6-P // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

8. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy ch. 1 st. 237 UPK RF v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B. T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. № 16-P // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

9. Barabash A.S. Suschnost' otechestvennogo ugolovnogo processa v svete rossiyskogo nacional'nogo mentaliteta: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2012. 26 s.

10. Hitrova O.V. Osobyy poryadok dvizheniya ugolovnogo dela ili vozvraschenie ugolovnogo dela dlya proizvodstva dopolnitel'nogo rassledovaniya ? // Ros. sledovatel'. 2013. № 21. S. 13-16.

11. Kal'nickiy V.V., Kuryahova T.V. Kakim mozhet byt' poryadok vozvrascheniya dela prokuroru dlya usileniya obvineniya // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. 2013. № 2. S. 50-53.

12. O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 236 i 237 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: federal'nyy zakon ot 21 iyulya 2014 № 269-FZ g. // Ros. gaz. 2014. 25 iyulya.

13. Murav'ev K.V. Sud kak organ, ispravlyayuschiy oshibki primeneniya ugolovnogo zakona // Ugolovnyy process. 2013. № 11. S. 50-55.

14. Murav'ev K.V. Tochnost' predvaritel'noy yuridicheskoy ocenki sodeyannogo i predely sudebnogo razbiratel'stva v Ustave ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i sovremennom prave // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5. S. 906-913.

15. Nikolyuk V.V., Kal'nickiy V.V., Kuryahova T.V. Vozvraschenie dela prokuroru dlya usileniya obvineniya stalo vozmozhnym // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 4. S. 84-89.

16. Shadrin V.S. Otkaz ot obvineniya i izmenenie prokurorom obvineniya v sudebnom razbiratel'stve // Kriminalist'. 2016. № 1. S. 20-25.

17. Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 noyab. 2015 g.: postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verhovnogo Suda RF № 79P14 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

18. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zaprosa Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda o proverke konstitucionnosti ch. 7 st. 246 i ch. 2 st. 254 UPK RF: opredelenie ot 14 dek. 2004 g. № 393-O // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

19. Po zaprosu Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda o proverke konstitucionnosti ch. 8 st. 246 UPK RF: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 10 fevr. 2016 g. № 226-O // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

© vestnikesiirk.ru
Support Powered by Editorum,  Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot password?