In the article, when analyzing the implementation of the preliminary investigation in contemporary Russian criminal justice, the authors note acute problems, which have their roots in the remote past, but today are of the utmost importance for the state legal and political life of the country. The authors pay special attention to the evaluation of the investigative power, which in its turn is the reflected light of the entire criminal justice process as a whole, it is the preliminary investigation that actually predetermines the ultimate fate of criminal cases, concentrated in the hands of one entity.
investigator, investigative power, investigative bodies, criminal policy, organization of preliminary investigation, service load, efficiency, personnel reserve, effectiveness of investigative activities
1. Sitdikova G.Z. Formirovanie professional'nyh kompetenciy specialistov sledstvennoy i operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. № 12 (103). S. 171-173.
2. Cvetkov Yu.A. Rol' sledstvennyh organov v realizacii ugolovnoy politiki // Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki primeneniya ugolovnogo zakona: materialy 1-y vseros. nauch.-prak. konf. / Rossiyskaya akademiya pravosudiya. M., 2014. S. 133-142.
3. Chaplygina V.N. Stanovlenie i tendencii razvitiya organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sistemy MVD Rossii (funkcional'no-strukturnyy podhod): dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. S. 187.
4. Rozin V. Psihologicheskiy analiz deyatel'nosti i myshleniya sledovatelya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 1999. № 4. S. 111-113.
5. Cvetkov Yu.A. Strategiya razvitiya sledstvennyh organov // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2013. № 10. S. 18-22.
6. Sitdikova G.Z. Professional'nyy standart sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Aktual'nye problemy prava i gosudarstva v XXI veke. 2016. № 4. S. 50-56.
7. Kleymenov M.P. Ugolovno-pravovoe prognozirovanie. Tyumen', 2009. S. 21.
8. Chaplygina V.N. Processual'naya samostoyatel'nost' sledovatelya: esche raz o nabolevshem // Nauchnyy vestnik Orlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni V.V. Luk'yanova. 2016. № 3 (68). S. 122-125.
9. Bagmet A.M., Cvetkov Yu.A. Psihologicheskie aspekty upravleniya vremenem v sledstvennyh organah // Yuridicheskaya psihologiya. 2014. № 1. S. 3-4.
10. Cvetkov Yu.A. Effektivnost' modeley organizacii sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ih resheniya: sb. nauch.-prak. trudov / pod red. A.I. Bastrykina. M., 2014. Vyp. 4. S. 291-295.
11. Shikanov V.I. Teoriya takticheskih operaciy sledovatelya // Algoritmy i organizaciya resheniy sledstvennyh zadach: sb. nauch. tr. Irkutsk, 2009. S. 133.
12. Chaplygina V.N. Sledstvennyy sud'ya v ugolovnom processe Rossii: TO BE OR NOT TO BE // Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupleniyami i inymi pravonarusheniyami. 2015. № 13-1. S. 226-228.
13. Bozoyan A.O. Sostoyanie i tendencii razvitiya sledstvennyh organov v Rossii: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2014. S. 12.
