The article analyzes the main legal decisions of the constitutional Court and the Supreme Court relating to the proceedings on consideration and resolution of issues related to the execution of the sentence and also defined the role of the decisions of these courts for its regulation. Based on the analysis of the current legislation and judicial practice, shortcomings in the legal regulation and practice of applying the provisions of Chapter 47 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation are revealed, and ways of their elimination are suggested. The author comes to the conclusion that the explanations and legal decisions of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation inherently bring certain clarity to a multitude of issues of legal regulation of this type of proceedings, while many unresolved issues in its legislative regulation require a systematic approach and comprehensive solutions.
judgment, sentence, justice, jurisdiction, right to legal defence, provisional release, substitution of the unserved part of punishment by light punishment
1. Doklad Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federacii za 2016 god. URL: http://ombudsmanrf.org/ content/doclad2016
2. Larin E. G. Novye raz'yasneniya Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii o prave na zaschitu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. 2015. № 2.
3. Nikolyuk V.V. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 20 dekabrya 2011 № 21 «O praktike primeneniya zakonodatel'stva ob ispolnenii prigovora» // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 3.
4. O praktike naznacheniya i izmeneniya sudami vidov ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniy: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.05.2014 № 9 // Ros. gaz. 2014. № 124. 4 iyunya.
5. O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel'stva ob ispolnenii prigovora : postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 20.12.2011 g. № 21 (red. ot 29.11.2016) // Ros. gaz. 2011. № 296.
6. O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel'stva, obespechivayuschego pravo na zaschitu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2015 № 29 // Ros. gaz. 2015. № 150.
7. O sudebnoy praktike uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya, zameny neotbytoy chasti nakazaniya bolee myagkim vidom nakazaniya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 21.04.2009 № 8 (red. ot 17.11.2015) // Ros. gaz. 2009. № 75. 29 apr.
8. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 11.07.2006 g. № 351-O.
9. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 11.07.2006 g. № 406-O.
10. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 01.10.2009 g. № 1053-O-O.
11. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 08.02.2007 g. № 257-O-P.
12. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 24.06.2008 g. № 279-O-O.
13. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 24.06.2008 g. № 373-O-O.
14. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 29.09.2011 g. № 1282-O-O.
15. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 25 oktyabrya 2001 g. № 14-P.
16. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 26.10.2003 g. № 20-P.
17. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 26.12.2003 g. № 20-P.
18. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 27.03.1996 g. № 8-P.
19. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 27.06.2000 g. № 11-P.
20. Pupysheva, L. A. Ugolovno-processual'naya deyatel'nost' v stadii ispolneniya prigovora: problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema segodnya: vzaimodeystvie nauki i praktiki: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf., 9-10 noyab. 2016 g. / otv. red. A. G. Antonov. Novokuzneck: FKOU VO Kuzbasskiy institut FSIN Rossii, 2016. S. 147-149.
