Introduction. The article examines the legal experience and regulatory framework governing the institution of exemption from criminal liability. By combining theoretical, methodological, and practice-oriented approaches to modeling legislative regulation, the study clarifies the legal nature of the grounds and conditions for such exemption. These are shaped by factors justifying the termination of criminal prosecution and the potential for alternative measures, provided that the offender no longer poses a public danger and the act committed is deemed insignificant. Furthermore, the study establishes the doctrinal and methodological foundations for distinguishing between exemption from criminal liability and exemption from punishment within national law. Finally, an analysis of Soviet-era criminal policy reveals specific features of legislative regulation that remain relevant for modern lawmakers. Materials and Methods. The study employed general and specific scientific methods to reveal the theoretical and methodological foundations for establishing exemption from criminal liability as an independent legal institution. These methods facilitated an analysis of the legal policy underlying this new direction in crime prevention and allowed for identifying the factors and stages of its legislative regulation within national law. The Results of the Study. The study reveals a wide variety of approaches to understanding the prerequisites for the legislative regulation of exemption from criminal liability. The authors substantiate the legislative formula for this institution as provided by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, incorporating legal experiences from both foreign and domestic legislation. The article addresses the specific features of regulating exemption from criminal liability and its various forms across different stages of state and legal development. Furthermore, the study identifies a correlation between scientific doctrine and law enforcement practices in defining "exemption from criminal liability." The relationship between different doctrinal approaches is clarified, the types of exemption are classified, and the key drivers and stages of legal policy regarding this institution's regulation are highlighted. Findings and Conclusions. In the context of modernizing the national legal system, the institution of exemption from criminal liability is undergoing transformation, characterized by the introduction of new forms. Historical legal analysis reveals a lengthy evolutionary process: certain forms, such as abolition or amnesty, were promulgated as tools to replace punitive repression with principles that appealed to higher psychological motivations and ethical incentives. The development of this institution was rooted in 18th-century scientific discourse, which laid the groundwork for new methods of addressing crime as a social phenomenon. The study concludes that exemption from criminal liability as a legal institution reached detailed legislative maturity during the Soviet period. This formalization was driven by intensified scholarly activity that redefined criminal liability as an independent legal phenomenon, distinct from punishment in both essence and substance. Doctrinal developments predetermined the modernization of a number of norms of the RSFSR Criminal Code of the 1926 edition, in which two concepts—"responsibility" and "criminal responsibility"—were to be distinguished and regulated. The legislative formalization of criminal responsibility was accompanied by the development of grounds both for bringing a person to criminal responsibility and for exempting them from it. This approach was carried out in accordance with the new directions in Soviet criminal policy, aimed at transforming legal consciousness and providing other methods and tools of legal influence on persons who committed crimes. The basis of the implemented criminal policy was, according to program documents, the replacement of the system of criminal punishments with a system of educational measures. As a result of the undertaken scientific research, as new directions in the development of the institution of exemption from criminal responsibility, the distinction between general and special norms was established. A qualitatively new approach was reflected in the Fundamentals of Criminal Legislation of the USSR and the Union republics of 1958, according to which, along with the recognition of exemption from criminal liability as an independent institution, the grounds and types of such exemption were subject to legislative formalization and consistent detailing.
national security, legal policy, criminal policy, criminal law, criminal punishment, criminal liability, legal experience, exemption from criminal liability
1. Efremova, I. A. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot nakazaniya v teorii ugolovnogo prava, zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoj praktike : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The institute of exemption from punishment in the theory of criminal law, legislation, and judicial practice: dissertation ... for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences]. Saratov, 2018, 226 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kaufman, M. A. K voprosu ob osnovanii osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti [On the Issue of Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability]. ZHurnal rossijskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 143-156. (In Russ.).
3. Matveeva, Ya. M. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti v rossijskom ugolovnom prave: modernizaciya i poisk al'ternativnyh sposobov uregulirovaniya ugolovno pravovogo konflikta : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The institute of exemption from criminal liability in Russian criminal law: modernization and search for alternative ways to resolve criminal-law conflicts: dissertation ... for the degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 2016, 222 p. (In Russ.).
4. Pudovochkin, Yu. E. Teoreticheskie voprosy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti [Theoretical issues of improving legislation on exemption from criminal liability]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. vol. 12, no. 3, 2021, pp. 584-603. (In Russ.).
5. Silantyev, S. A. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti kak sredstvo ee differenciacii: obshchie i chastnye problemy i puti ih resheniya [Release from criminal liability as a means of its differentiation: general and specific problems and ways to solve them]. Rossijsko-Aziatskij pravovoj zhurnal – Russian-Asian Law Journal. 2024, no. 4, pp. 84-89. (In Russ.).
6. Principes généraux du droit pénal belge. Bookreader Item Preview by Haus, J. J. 1885. Paris, Thorin. 670 p.
7. Pravo amnistii: istoriko-dogmaticheskoe i politicheskoe issledovanie P. I. Lyublinskogo [The Right of Amnesty: Historical-Dogmatic and Political Study by P. I. Lyublinsky]. St. Petersburg: Senate Printing House, 1907, 363 p. (In Russ.).
8. Dei delitti e delle pene di Cesare Beccaria. Prima edizione, 1764, 121 p.
9. O prestupleniyah i nakazaniyah. Perevel s francuzskogo A. Hrushchov. V Sankt-Peterburge: V tipografii I. Glazunova [On Crimes and Punishments. Translated from French by A. Khrushchev. In Saint Petersburg: At the printing house of I. Glazunov], 1806, 200 p. (In Russ.).
10. Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm von: Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden Peinlichen Rechts. Giessen, 1801. 563 p. (In Russ.).
11. Lokhvitsky, A. Kurs russkogo ugolovnogo prava [Course of Russian Criminal Law]. St. Petersburg, 1867, 662 p. (In Russ.).
12. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava professora P. D. Kalmykova. Izdannyj A. Lyubavskim. CHast' Obshchaya [Textbook of Criminal Law by Professor P. D. Kalmykov. Published by A. Lyubavsky. General Part]. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Partnership “Public Benefit”, 1866, 535 p. (In Russ.).
13. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti. Ordinarnogo professora Universiteta sv. Vladimira L. S. Belogric-Kotlyarevskogo [Textbook of Russian Criminal Law. General and Special Parts. By Ordinary Professor of St. Vladimir University L. S. Belogrits-Kotlyarevsky]. Kyiv : I. I. Chokolov Printing House, 1903, 618 p. (In Russ.).
14. Tagantsev, N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. CHast' Obshchaya. T. II. [Russian Criminal Law. General Part. Vol. II]. Tula: Autograph, 2001, 688 p. (In Russ.).
15. Berman, Ya. O revolyucionnyh tribunalah [On Revolutionary Tribunals]. Proletarskaya revolyuciya i pravo – Proletarian Revolution and Law. 1919, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47-78. (In Russ.).
16. Kursky, D. Iz praktiki narodnogo suda [From the practice of the people's court]. Proletarskaya revolyuciya i pravo – Proletarian Revolution and Law. 1919, vol. 11, no. 1, (11). pp. 29-35. (In Russ.).
17. Tarnovsky, E. Dvizhenie prestupnosti v predelah RSFSR po svedeniyam mestnyh sudov za 1919-20 gg. [Crime trends within the RSFSR according to the data of local courts for 1919-20]. Proletarskaya revolyuciya i pravo – Proletarian Revolution and Law. 1921, no. 15, pp. 4-12. (In Russ.).
18. Tarnovsky, E. Sudebnaya repressiya v cifrah [Judicial repression in figures]. Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoj yusticii – Weekly of Soviet Justice. 1922, no. 44-45, pp. 43-44. (In Russ.).
19. Sbornik cirkulyarov Verhovnogo tribunala VCIK za vremya s 1 yanvarya po 1 oktyabrya 1922 goda: S prilozheniem form i obrazcov aktov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya [Collection of circulars of the Supreme Tribunal of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee for the period from January 1 to October 1, 1922: With the attachment of forms and samples of preliminary investigation acts]. Moscow : Publishing House of the Department of Judicial Supervision of the Supreme Tribunal of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, 1922, 135 p. (In Russ.).
20. Trudy Central'nogo statisticheskogo upravleniya. T. XVIII. Sbornik statisticheskih svedenij po Soyuzu SSR. 1918-1923 / Red. M. Krasil'nikov [Works of the Central Statistical Administration. Vol. XVIII. Collection of statistical data on the USSR. 1918-1923 / Ed. M. Krasilnikov]. Moscow: State Socio-Economic Publishing House, 1924, 85 p. (In Russ.).
21. Nemirovsky, E. Ya. Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Posobie k izucheniyu nauki ugolovnogo prava i dejstvuyushchego Ugolovnogo Kodeksa SSSR. CH. Obshchaya i Osobennaya [Soviet Criminal Law. A manual for studying the science of criminal law and the current Criminal Code of the USSR. Part. General and Special]. Odessa, 1924, 292 p. (In Russ.).
22. Piontkovsky, A. A. Ugolovnoe pravo RSFSR. Obshchaya chast' [Criminal Law of the RSFSR. General Part]. Moscow : State Publishing House, 1924, 235 p. (In Russ.).
23. Krylenko, N. V. Sud i pravo v SSSR: teoreticheskij i prakticheskij kommentarij k osnovam sudoustrojstva, sudoproizvodstva i material'nogo ugolovnogo prava SSSR. CHast' tret'ya. Osnovy ugolovnogo material'nogo prava [Court and Law in the USSR: Theoretical and Practical Commentary on the Fundamentals of the Judiciary, Legal Proceedings, and Substantive Criminal Law of the USSR. Part Three. Fundamentals of Substantive Criminal Law]. Moscow, Leningrad : State Publishing House, 1930, 184 p. (In Russ.).
24. Avdeev, V. A. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Kurs lekcij [Russian Criminal Law. General Part. Lecture Course. In 3 vols. Vol. 2. Part 2]. Moscow : Buky Vedi, 2023, 472 p. (In Russ.).
